Powered by DeepSeek V3 • Multi-Agent Architecture

Intelligent grading for
every rubric

From a physics exam to a startup's pitch deck, GradeWise learns your rubric and grades against it — a self-correcting multi-agent AI with two purpose-built modes: a classroom test grader and a business-plan competition judge.

Grounded, Consistent, and Reliable
Privacy-First Design

One grader, two modes

GradeWise grades anything you can put a rubric on. Pick the mode that fits the work — the same self-correcting engine underneath.

Classroom & tests

Grade essays, exams, and assignments against your rubric. Pulls context from your course materials, writes Socratic feedback, and flags low-confidence results for a human look.

  • Rubric-aligned scoring
  • RAG course context
  • Socratic feedback
  • Mass grading + analytics
Open the classroom grader

Business plans & competitions

Screen and rank a whole field of business plans. Every point is cited to the plan, graded several times for a real confidence, with a shortlist your panel can defend.

  • Live grading theater
  • Evidence-linked scoring
  • Leaderboard with a tie band
  • Fairness & eligibility screening
Watch it grade a plan
DeepSeek V3
LLM Engine
4-Node LangGraph
Agent Architecture
ChromaDB
Vector Database
20+ Formats
File Support

Everything You Need to Scale

Powerful tools built specifically for high-volume grading environments.

4-Node Multi-Agent System

LangGraph orchestrates Retrieve, Grade, Validate, and Mentor nodes with self-correction loops for accuracy.

Privacy-First Architecture

Local ChromaDB vector store with HuggingFace embeddings. Your course materials and student data never leave your control.

Mass Grading at Scale

Upload dozens of submissions at once. The agent processes them in parallel with consistent rubric application.

RAG-Powered Context

Automatically retrieves relevant context from your textbooks and lecture notes to fact-check student answers.

For competitions

Screen the field. Defend the shortlist.

The business mode grades a whole competition in one run and forms the ranking live. It cites every point to the plan, screens eligibility and AI content, and flags a statistical tie at the cutoff so a sub-point gap never decides a prize.

Live grading theater

Watch the real pipeline judge each plan, stage by stage.

Evidence-linked scoring

Every point cites the exact passage in the plan.

Defensible leaderboard

Ranking with a tie band at the shortlist cutoff.

Fairness & integrity

Eligibility, AI-content, and disparate-impact checks.

Watch a plan get graded
Leaderboard · 300 plansTop 3 advance
1Okavango Solar88
2MamaMarket82
3AgriConnect71
4ClinicLink70.5
5PayGridneeds review63
Ranks 3 & 4 are within the noise — a human breaks the tie.
cited
Every point
5× / plan
Graded
CSV·PDF·DOCX
Rubric in
slides + figures
Reads
Evidence-linked

Every point, cited to the plan.

No hand-wavy scores. Each criterion carries the exact quote from the submission that earned or lost the marks — and a quote that isn't really in the plan is rejected. Disputes resolve in seconds, and your panel debates substance, not the tool.

Graded 5× · agrees with the human panel
AgriConnect — Business Plan
Scored against the 80-pt rubric
Eligible
Problem & pain8/8
Market sizing6/8

“2.3 million smallholder farmers in the northern corridor…”

Financials4/6
Team5/6
Confidence from 5 runs71/80

The judging pipeline, out loud

The same five stages you watch in the Grading Theater — every plan moves through them in order.

  1. 01

    Screen the gate

    Eligibility, disqualifiers, and AI-content flags before ranking.

  2. 02

    Read the plan

    Score each criterion on the evidence actually present.

  3. 03

    Second opinion

    A Judge checks it and sends it back to re-score if it's off.

  4. 04

    Coach the team

    Specific, encouraging feedback for the founders.

  5. 05

    Verdict

    A defensible score plus a pinned grade-of-record.

Analytics & Performance Tracking

Monitor class performance, identify struggling students, and track AI confidence scores in real-time.

For Educators

Total Control at Scale

Manage rubrics, review AI grades with confidence scores, track class performance, and identify low-confidence results for manual review—all from one unified dashboard.

Analytics Dashboard

View grade distributions, average scores, and identify outliers. Track class performance over time.

Confidence Scoring

The Judge agent assigns confidence scores (0-100%). Low-confidence results are flagged for your review.

Mass Grading

Process dozens of submissions simultaneously. Upload ZIP files with multiple student works for batch grading.

educator.graderwise.com
Avg Confidence
94%
Class Avg
78.2
Praise E. - Physics 101
Needs Review • Confidence: 68%

Don't Build Rubrics.
Just Upload Them.

Stop wasting hours manually entering grading criteria. GradeWise parses your existing Word, PDF, or Excel rubrics and instantly converts them into an active AI grading agent.

.DOCX
.PDF
.XLSX
rubric_parser.exe

Drop your rubric file here

or click "Try Live Demo" to simulate

The Multi-Agent Workflow

Four specialized AI agents work together to ensure grading accuracy

Retrieve Agent

RAG queries ChromaDB to fetch relevant context from your course materials based on rubric criteria.

01

Grader Agent

DeepSeek V3 evaluates the submission against your rubric with quantitative scaling and explicit scoring.

02

Judge Agent

Quality assurance layer validates scoring consistency. Rejects and loops back if errors are detected.

03

Mentor Agent

Generates Socratic feedback to guide students without giving away answers. Encourages critical thinking.

04

Built for Academia

Designed to support every role in the grading workflow.

ScaleConsistency

University Professors

Focus on research and lectures while GradeWise handles the grading of hundreds of weekly assignments.

FairnessSpeed

Teaching Assistants

Ensure grading consistency across multiple TAs. Use GradeWise as a 'first pass' to standardize feedback.

PrivacyStandards

Dept. Heads

Maintain rigorous academic standards with localized privacy. No data leaves your institution's control.

Trusted with the hard calls

From classrooms to competition panels.

For the first time the shortlist held up under questioning. Every score pointed to a line in the plan — the panel debated substance, not the tool.
Amara Okonkwo
Lead Judge · Business Plan Competition
We screened three hundred plans in an afternoon and still hand-reviewed every flagged one. The tie band at the cutoff saved us a genuinely unfair call.
Kwabena Mensah
Programme Director
I grade five classes of essays a week. GradeWise does the first pass and I keep the final word — hours back, every Sunday.
Dr. Ngozi Eze
Senior Lecturer

Grade the next batch on evidence.

Set your rubric, upload the work — a pop quiz or a whole competition field — and let GradeWise do the first pass while you keep the final word.